Q&A with Dana Portfolio Manager: Michael Honkamp, CFA


Dana_Michael Honkamp

Michael Honkamp, CFA joined Dana Investment Advisors in 1999 and has been managing equity portfolios since 2003. Recently, a member of our team sat down with Michael and asked him a few questions about his career and experience.  

Q: How did you wind up at Dana Investment Advisors?

A: Mike Dana, founder of Dana Investment Advisors, was a Cub Scout leader with my mother. He offered advice when I was in school, and brought me in for lunch one day during college to explain his view of the business. Years later in 1998, after a bout of entrepreneurialism, we reconnected and he offered some bond projects to occupy me as an intern. Eventually they started paying me and taking me to meetings!


Q: What was the transition like from fixed income to equity investing?

A: As a backdrop, I had always been interested in the equity markets. I started reading about them in high school and took relevant classes in college and graduate school. Initially, Dana had an opportunity for me on the fixed income side, which I accepted as a challenge and to ensure I could get established in the field. After the late 2002 market turbulence I started working on a portfolio of lower volatility and higher income large cap stocks for a client. That started my pull into equities and in 2006 I began helping with other strategies.


Q: What is the culture like at Dana?

A: The culture was very entrepreneurial in the beginning, which suited my skills and experience. Over time the firm has grown from $1b to $7b, and there are more specific demands requiring specialized attention. Importantly, however, industrious and curious thinkers are still rewarded. The investment team has a lot of freedom, even though we operate all equity and bond strategies with a disciplined process, but we are involved in some detail on most aspects of the verticals we work in – like sales, service, and communication – so as individuals we have to maintain an entrepreneurial posture. There are a lot of dimensions to what we are expected to be able to do.


Q: As more and more money flows into passive small-cap products, low- or non-earning companies are being lifted with strong-earning companies alike.  Does this present any opportunities for active managers like yourself?

A: Opportunities is a funny word there. The passive wave often seems more like a puzzle, and we spend time trying to understand it. One challenge it presents is the potential for positive correlation between high and low-quality companies in a given period, what some call reduced-correlation differentials. There are other aspects to the passive impact that many strategists are still studying. Fortunately, there are a lot of storylines in the small cap space, so we do not have to focus on the non-earning element any more than we have to focus on the other puzzles we find in our space. In the end, clients expect us to choose good stocks.


Q: What are some broad market trends you’re monitoring now? Is anything keeping you up at night?

A: There are some tensions in the market – like between valuation and momentum. Recently we have been in an environment where market factors such as sales growth are very important, and stable-growth companies with great profitability may be getting less attention if their top line can’t move higher fast enough. While not keeping me up at night, I am concerned liquidity and electronic trading may amplify volatility within short term market adjustments. I’m unsure how prepared retail investors or advisors are for real volatility.



Stay up to date with current market trends. Subscribe to Dana market insights.



Back to Blog